Sahdeo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32712 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2015 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Sahdeo Paswan Son of Tapeshwar Paswan Resident of Village- Kranja, P.S- Naubatpur, District Patna, At Present resident of Village- Kajra, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 209 of 2015 registered for the offences under Sections 326, 307, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the allegation, the informant came on Scooty at main road of Abhimanyu Nagar for going towards his new house in Bank Colony and stopped near a goomti. After sometime, co-accused Nagendra Singh came with two unknown persons (one of the unknown persons has beard) and indicates towards the informant. Thereafter, Nagendra Singh went away and said beard unknown person, who has fired upon the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32712 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016 2/2 informant and the informant sustained injury in his abdomen. One unknown person could escape from there but the present petitioner has been caught by other persons.
Allegation has been made that the informant has lodged Sanha against co-accused Nagendra Singh and his son Suraj Singh earlier the reason is that they wanted to capture the land of the informant.
Considering this aspect of the matter that the petitioner was caught at the spot, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.
The court below is directed to expedite the trial and complete the same within one year.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) ajaypd./- U T