Anisur Rahman And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35913 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2012 Thana -RAMGARHWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Anisur Rahman Son of Late SK. Latif.

2. Sahela Khatoon, Wife of Anisur Rahman.

3. Sk. Iftakhar.

4. SK. Tabrej

5. SK. Juned @ SK. Junaid.

All Sons of Anisur Rahman.

6. SK. Majbullah Son of Late SK. Kharbullah

7. Rashan Khatoon, Wife of SK. Ajad Amin.

All Resident of Village: Murgia Tola, P.S: Ramgarhwa, District: EastChamparan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Adya Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 04-09-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners being the parents, brothers, co-villager and second wife of the husband of the victim are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35913 of 2015 (02) dt.04-09-2015 2/3 punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation of killing the sister of the informant after 16 years of marriage for non-fulfillment of the dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation of demanding dowry after 16 years appears to be unreasonable and there is omnibus and general accusation against entire family. The husband of the victim filed Informatory petition that the victim become traceless prior to the filing of the present case. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the accused persons have killed the sister of the informant.

Considering the fact that the impugned order does not suggest any eye witness to the occurrence and the accusation is omnibus and general, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35913 of 2015 (02) dt.04-09-2015 3/3 Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari (East Champaran) in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 121 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T