Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32937/2016bail granted

Bishok Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32937 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2011 Thana -AKILPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Bishok Rai S/o Rup Narayan Rai

2. Ashok Rai S/o Rup Narayan Rai

3. Dinesh Rai S/o Late Sringar Rai

4. Nunu Rai S/o Late Sringar Rai All are resident of Village- Hawaspur, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 06.06.2016 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 260(B) of 2012, Trial No. 372(A) of 2016 arising out of Akilpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2011 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 302, 423, 429, 341 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners had been regularly appearing before the committing Court but after commitment, default was committed as the petitioners had gone to Punjab for earning their livelihood. The petitioners thereafter suo motu surrendered on 06.06.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32937 of 2016 (2) dt.22-08-2016 2/2

4. Considering the submissions on behalf of the petitioners, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge Vth, Danapur, (Patna) in connection with Sessions Trial No. 260(B) of 2012, Trial No. 372(A) of 2016 arising out of Akilpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2011,subject to the condition that the petitioners shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T