Bachchu Yadav And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43796 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2012 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Bachchu Yadav, Son of Late Budhlal Yadav, Resident of VillageKumardih, Police Station-Makhdumpur in the District of Jehanabad.

2. Ram Babu Prasad, Son of Late Deo Sharan Yadav Resident of VillageIslamchak, Police Station-Kako in the district of Jehanabad.

3. Ashok Kumar, Son of Jay Nandan Prasad, Resident of Village-Repura, Police Station-Kako in the district of Jehanabad.

4. Brijnandan Kumar, Son of Kunuj Bihari Yadav, Resident of VillageRepura, Police Station-Kako in the district of Jehanabad.

5. Shiv Kumar, Son of Jay Nandan Prasad, Resident of Village-Repura, Police Station-Kako in the district of Jehanabad.

6. Arun Kumar, Son of Jay Nandan Prasad, Resident of Village-Repura, Police Station-Kako in the district of Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Nazir Ansari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

There is case and counter case in between both sides. In the counter case, case is at argument stage but the case against the petitioners is still at appearance stage and they are evading the appearance before the court. However, be that as it may, there is no any ground for interference with the cognizance order as it is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43796 of 2014 (3) dt.17-11-2017 2/2 not the case that no prima facie case is disclosed from the allegation or from the statement of the witnesses collected during the investigation, so this application stands dismissed. (Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T