Laxman Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29334 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

LAXMAN PASWAN Son of Late Rambriksh Paswan Resident of Village - Asarwaliya, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Bhabua at Kaimur. 2.

Chand Jyoti Devi W/o Laxman Paswan Resident of Village - Asarwaliya, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Bhabua at Kaimur.

3.

Rahul Kumar Son of Laxman Paswan Resident of Village - Asarwaliya, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Bhabua at Kaimur.

4.

Surya Prakash Paswan Son of Laxman Paswan Resident of Village - Asarwaliya, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Bhabua at Kaimur. 5.

Kameshwar Paswan Son of Late Ram Briksh Paswan Resident of Village - Asarwaliya, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Bhabua at Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable Sections 341, 323, 494 and 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29334 of 2021(2) dt.09-02-2022 2/2 It is a case cruelty due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that specific allegation is against the husband of the victim and petitioners are family members of the husband of the victim and they have no concern with the mess and business of the husband of the victim. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 76 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T