Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27974 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2015 Thana -BIBHUTIPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Ram Kumar S/o Jagdish Mahto resident of Village- Khadiyahi, P.S. - Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Suneil Kumar Thakur,Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Anant Kumar (APP237) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected by order dated 16.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7036 of 2016 which was disposed of with Cr. Misc. No. 2820 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 21.09.2015 and up till now, charge has not been framed, resulting in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. Other coaccused Ramanand Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, Bikram Kumar and Ram Kishun Mahto have already been allowed bail and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that against the petitioner and co-accused Sanjay
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27974 of 2016 (2) dt.13-07-2016 2/2 Kumar, there is specific allegation for assaulting the deceased with iron rod and khanti.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail in S.T. No. 691 of 2015, arising out of Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 192 of 2015 stands rejected.
However, considering the period of detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ravi/- U T