Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23844/2025dismissed

Nausad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23844 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Nausad Alam S/O Fakrey Alam R/O Village- Bathua Bazar, P.S- Phulwariya, Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adesh Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 182 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.03.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24781 of 2024 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 182 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23844 of 2025(5) dt.10-02-2026 2/2

3. The wife of the deceased who is the informant of the case had conspired with her lover who is the petitioner and got her husband killed. The money for killing the deceased was provided by the informant. The petitioner was caught and on his confessional statement Parwez Alam was caught from whom the pistol used in the crime has been recovered. The petitioner is in jail since 26.05.2023.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the charges have already been framed and the trial of the petitioner has started.

4. In view of the above, this Court finds no new ground to review its earlier order.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U