Phagu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59788 of 2018 Arising out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2016 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna =============================================== Phagu Yadav Son of Jagan Yadav, resident of Village- Tikulpar, P.S. Sigori, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, APP =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 269 and 270 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 15 litres of country-made liquor was recovered in a jerkin from the bank of Punpun river and on the basis of statement of the villagers the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is contended that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovered illicit liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59788 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 possession of the petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner has been made accused in another case, i.e., Sigori P.S. Case No. 92 of 2015 registered for the offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 24.08.2018. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Sigori P.S. Case No. 31 of 2016 (Special Case No. 7752 of 2018) with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T