Nagendra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5738 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Nagendra Choudhary Son of Late Rambriksh Choudhary Resident of Village-Chakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffarpur. 2.
Chandra Bhushan Chaudahry Son of Bishdeshwar Chaudahry Resident of Village-Chakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 3.
Ram Kali Devi Wife of Devendra Chaudahry Resident of VillageChakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 4.
Dhananjay Kumar Son of Bindeshwar Chaudhary Resident of VillageChakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 5.
Kishori Choudhary Son of Late Ram Japu Choudhary Resident of VillageChakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 6.
Mohan Choudhary Son of Late Mohan Choudhary, Resident of VillageChakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 7.
Chandeshwar Choudhary Son of Late Langat Choudhary Resident of Village-Chakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur 8.
Ratneshwar Chaudahry Son of Ram Rekha Chaudahry Resident of VillageChakbarkurva, P.O. Bishundatpur, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffapur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Revenue and Land reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Union of India through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum, New Delhi.
3.
The Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Cum Saksham Office, Pipe line Project, Pandey Tola, Railway Gumti, Vishmnpur, Ward no.-7, Jivdhara, P.S.-Piprakothi, East Champaran, 845429.
4.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Range, tirhut Commissioner, Muzaffarpur, 5.
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
6.
The DCLR, West Muzaffarpur.
7.
The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 8.
The DCLR, East Champaran at Motihari.
9.
Nayayalay Saksham Pradhikar, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., M.M.P.L., Project, Nirman Karyalay, I.R.P.L. Patna, Patna, Hira Niketan, Kaliket nagar, Beli road, Patna-801503.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate Ms. Rupa Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, Advocate
2/4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ======================================================= (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/ Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential ofÏces/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/ofÏces.) ======================================================= Date : 24-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):-
3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, states that the petitioners shall be content if the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and/or take recourse to such other alternative remedies, equally efficacious in law. Permission granted.
We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4/4 Needless to add, the authorities/adjudicative body shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 30.06.2022 Transmission Date