Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20860 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
RANJEET YADAV SON OF MAHINDRA YADAV S/O- TINTANGI (TANUA),WARD NO.13 (RAJESHWARI, O.P.), P.S.- CHHATAPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL 2.
SANDEEP YADAV SON OF ISHWAR YADAV S/O- TINTANGI (TANUA),WARD NO.13 (RAJESHWARI, O.P.), P.S.- CHHATAPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has antecedent of four cases and allegation is of recovery of 14.580 litre of liquor from the road beside Vinod Ram's shop. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20860 of 2022(2) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 submitted that even the alleged place, from where recovery was made, does not belong to the petitioner and they came to be implicated at the instance of chawkidar with whom they are on an inimical term.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) by petitioner no. 1 and Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) by petitioner no. 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 33 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T