Md. Nakki Kureshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20696 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Md. Nakki Kureshi, S/o Late Riazul Qureshi, R/o vill- Maulanachak, Miyan Sahab Maidan, P.S.- Mojahidpur, Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.90 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2) and 109 of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted with knife to one Md. Dablu and Md. Fizan.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the injury report which is annexed at Annexure-2 Series it will transpire that the doctor has opined

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20696 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 that the nature of injury is simple probably due to hard blunt object. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. it is clear that there is allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted with knife whereas the injury report goes to show that the injuries received by the injured is caused by hard and blunt substance. The injuries do not correlate with the allegation. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 24.07.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIX, Bhagalpur in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.90 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T