Amrita Raut @ Guriya And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35348 of 2014 Arising Out of P.S. Case No. -702 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ===========================================================

1. AMRITA RAUT @ GURIYA WIFE OF RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH MANDAL DAUGHTER OF AJAY RAUT

2. ANITA RAUT WIFE OF AJAY RAUT

3. AJAY RAUT SON OF LATE FAGULAL RAUT

4. AMIT RAUT SON OF AJAY RAUT

5. SUMIT RAUT SON OF AJAY RAUT

6. MANISHA RAUT WIFE OF AMIT RAUT ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLAH- SAHEB BANDHPARA, ATC LANE, P.S.- RANIGANJ, DISTRICT- BURDWAN (WEST BENGAL)

7. VIKRAM KUMAR SON OF SHANKAR RAUT RESIDENT OF MOHALLAH- PURANI BAZAR, P.S.- PIPRADIH BAZAR, DISTRICT- JAMUI (BIHAR) .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR

2. MUKESH KUMAR SON OF GANAURI MANDAL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLAH- EAST YOGIPUR (NEAR BUDDHA CENTAL COLLEGE) P.S.- PATRAKAR NAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA (BIHAR) .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gokaran Prasad Singh and Mr. Nawal Kishor Prasad, Advocates.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER Date: 28-08-2017 No one appears for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no. 2 is present.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 in which a categorical statement has been made that in the present case, now charges have already been framed on 09.08.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35348 of 2014 dt.28-08-2017 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is that the present application has, in fact, become infructuous. Since no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioners, let the application stand dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.08.2017 Transmission Date N/A