Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63222/2018bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63222 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2017 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Ramagya Yadav, Resident of Village- Tarachak, P.S. Azimabad, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

FIR was registered against unknown. Name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case only on confessional statement of co-accused Santosh Samrat @ Sunny who has already been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27.06.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35754 of 2018. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner has surrendered on 29.06.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63222 of 2018(2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2017 subject to the condition that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T