Hasmuddin Ansari @ Hasmaddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19596 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Hasmuddin Ansari @ Hasmaddin Ansari S/o Late Newal Miyan R/o Village - Surangi, Police Station - Anandpur (Bhairoganj), District - Banka 2.

Mukhtar Ansari @ Md. Mukhtar S/o Rafid Ansari R/o Village - Surangi, Police Station - Anandpur (Bhairoganj), District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 as he has already been arrested during pendency of the case.

2. Permission is granted.

3. This anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

5. Petitioner no. 1 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19596 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

6. As per F.I.R., this petitioner assaulted one Isrel Ansari by means of sword.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Injury, allegedly, caused by this petitioner is simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

8. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

9. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation, injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Anandpur P. S. Case No. 102 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T