Dhananjay Gop v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10615 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -620 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHARSHARIF District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Dhananjay Gop Son of Uttimchand Gop @ Uttichandra Gop, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Gaura Garh, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections-307, 386 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section-27 of the Arms Act.

As per written report, there is allegation against the coaccused Sanjay Gope of causing fire-arm injury on the right thigh of the informant. The petitioner is merely alleged to be member of a mob.

Considering the above-said facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, this anticipatory bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10615 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 620 of 2015 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif subject to conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T