Munar Risideo @ Mundar Risideo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32515 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 1998 Thana -SIKTI District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Munar Risideo @ Mundar Risideo son of Late Ganeshi Risideo @ Maheshi Risideo Resident of Village-Dip Nagar, Police Station- Sikty, District- Araria (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baleshwar Kamat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard.

Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 08.01.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.721 of 2016 taking note of his previous conduct but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is in jail custody since 07.09.2015 and up till now, four prosecution witnesses have only been examined but they have not supported the prosecution case. It is further pointed out that altogether six proposed persecution witnesses have been shown in the charge sheet and out of the aforesaid six proposed prosecution witnesses, two proposed prosecution witnesses have already died. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32515 of 2016 (3) dt.21-09-2016 2/2 well as submissions of the parties, and also taking note of the period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 3rd, Araria in connection with Session trial no. 128 of 2016 arising out of Sikty P.S.Case No. 27 of 1998, subject to the condition that petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date for the period of six months or till conclusion of his trial, whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after due and proper inquiry. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T