← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/222/2026dismissed

Sanjha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-25The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.222 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3101 of 2026 ====================================================== Sanjha Devi Wife of Sri Narayan Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Majhaulia, Mome Factory Campus, Near Kabristan, Ward No.- 27, P.O.- GPO, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Muzaffarpur. Presently Vice-Chairman, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner -cum- Dy. Director, Panchayati Raj, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner -Cum- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi.

5.

Aditi Kumari, Wife of Rajiv Kumar Bhandari Resident of Village and PostRanjitpur, Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Puroura, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Adv.

Mr. Awnish Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Standing Counsel (25) For Resp No.4 :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For Resp No.5 :

Mr. Jai Vardhan Narayan, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-03-2026 This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.3101 of 2026.

2. Upon perusal of the said order, it appears that the matter has been posted to 02.04.2026 and has been directed to

Patna High Court L.P.A No.222 of 2026(3) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 be listed among the top ten cases.

3. In view of the aforesaid order passed by the learned Single Judge, and as the matter is sub judice, we are not inclined to entertain the present Letters Patent Appeal. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed.

(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ) ( Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U