← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24375/2024bail rejected

Vikash Sahani @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-24Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24375 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2024 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== VIKASH SAHANI @ VIKASH KUMAR S/O WAKIL SAHANI R/O VILLAGE- BALUGHAT, P.S- L.N.M.U (UNIVERSITY), DISTT.- DARBHANGA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, Sections 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act and Sections 20/22 of the NDPS Act.

3.

As per FIR, there is recovery of one country made pistol, 36 litre of illicit liquor and 500 gram Ganja from possession of this petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24375 of 2024(3) dt.24-04-2024 2/2 implicated in the present case. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from conscious physical possession of this petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 29.01.2024. 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6.

In view of the submissions, as made above, as there is recovery of one country made pistol, 36 litre of illicit liquor and 500 gram Ganja were made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

8.

Learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of this case expeditiously.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) S.Katyayan/- U T