Chandra Shekhar Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38046 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR =====================================
1. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Son of Dineshwar Yadav
2. Sukh Deo Yadav
3. Chandeshwar Yadav Both Sons of Siya Ram Yadav
4. Chandrabhusan Yadav, Son of Dineshwar Yadav
5. Maharaj Yadav, Son of Neta Yadav
6. Nandu Yadav, Son of Raja Yadav All are resident of Village - Kunjan Tola, P.S. - Chandi, District - Bhojpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Md. Ataul Haque, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Madhuri Lata, A.P.P. ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Chandi P.S. Case No.23 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 323, 354(A), 307, 448, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits, as would be apparent from the First Information Report, that the occurrence took place because of dispute over passage between the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38046 of 2015 (2) dt.18-09-2015 2/2 informant's side and the petitioners' side. He further submits that case and counter case have been instituted on the same date.
Keeping in view the nature of allegation and the submission as above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, abovenamed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Arrah in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.23 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U T