Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60301/2018bail granted

Jeetu @ Kana v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-11Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60301 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2017 Thana- BIHARSHARIF RAIL P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Jeetu @ Kana S/o Jethan @ Nand Kishore (Thathera) resident of VillageKalisthan, Sabenhua, Bazar Harnaut Adarsh Nagar, P.S. Harnaut, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Rail P.S. (Bihar Sharif) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

FIR was lodged against unknown persons. Name of petitioner has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Vikky. Petitioner was neither arrested at the spot nor any incriminating material has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 23.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60301 of 2018(2) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Railway Court, Patna, in connection with Rail P.S. (Bihar Sharif) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T