Vikki Kumar @ Arbhjeet Aryan @ Amarjit Aryan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19796 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2018 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== VIKKI KUMAR @ ARBHJEET ARYAN @ AMARJIT ARYAN, Male, aged about 36 years, S/o Ram Lakhan Thakur, R/o Village- Manoharpur, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that ATM machine in which Rs.1,69,500/- cash was kept has been looted by some unidentified miscreants.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. Nothing was recovered from his possession. It has further been submitted that name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the confessional statement made by the co-accused Nehal and except said confessional statement, there is no any other incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19796 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 material against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.226 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T