Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60775 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -178 Year- 2018 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Ajeet Kumar, Son of Umesh Kumar Choudhary, Resident of VillageSugaun, Police Station- Makhddumpur (O.P.- Tehata), District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehta) P.S.Case no.178 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 354(A), 498(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the D.P. Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of Rs.5 lac and also assaulting the informant and not keeping her in his house. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the false implication will appear from the fact that the petitioner has filed case before the learned Family Court, Jehanbad for restitution of the conjugal right and he is in custody for three months and the charge-sheet has been submitted. Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60775 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018 2/2 informant. .

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehata) P.S.Case No.178 of 2018 .

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T