← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./1039/2014dismissed

Sudama Ram @ Sudama Kumar Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-09-03Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 1039 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- SIWAN ======================================================== Sudama Ram @ Sudama Kumar Ram Son of Shri Ram Raj Ram Resident of Village - Rukundipur, Police Station - Daraunda, District - Siwan under the guardianship of his father, namely, Shri Ram Raj Ram son of Ramayan Ram, Resident of Village - Rukundipur, Police Station - Daraunda, District - Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Narin Mahto Son of Dudhnath Mahto Resident of Village - Rukundipur Tola Dhanauti, Police Station - Daraunda, District - Siwan.

.... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar-I, APP. ======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

This revision application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 23.08.2014 passed by the 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Siwan in Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2014, by which he has affirmed the order dated 17.04.2014 passed by the Principal, Juvenile Justice Board, Siwan in G.R. No. 3958 of 2013 arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 260 of 2013 (Tr. No. 1210 of 1996).

Considering the conduct of the Petitioner, I am

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1039 of 2014 dt.03-09-2015 not inclined to entertain this application. The same is dismissed.

The Court below is directed to expedite the inquiry and conclude the same within a period of six months without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. For this reason, he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order, to the Superintendent of Police, Siwan, and the Superintendent of Police, Siwan is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T