← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20133/2026allowed

Bharat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-10Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20133 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Bharat Kumar S/O Baidhnath Sahni@ Bainath Sahani R/O village - Dharna Tola, P.S- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 1000 of 2025 arising out of Abhiyapur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while the informant was returning home on his bike, three miscreants intercepted him and on gun point attempted to snatch the backpack. When the informant objected, they fired at him and took his backpack which has two books, Aadhar card and passbook.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20133 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that during the course of the investigation, one Ritesh Kumar was apprehended in this case from Bochaha PS. Case No. 32 of 2025, wherein he has given his confessional statement, and the name of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Ritesh Kumar. He further submits that one passbook has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Save and except this, nothing is against the petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Ritesh Kumar, has been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 76457 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of eight cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned trial court, one of the bailor should be his near

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20133 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 3/3 relative and shall also mark his weekly attendance at Bochaha P.S. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge11, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 1000 of 2025 arising out of Abhiyapur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T