Aman Raj @ Dimpal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19123 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2045 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Aman Raj @ Dimpal Kumar S/O Ajay Prasad R/O Vill.- Chero, P.S.- Sarmera, Dist.- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 2045 of 2025 dated 20.09.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 317(2), 317(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 112(2) and 61(2)(A) of B.N.S., 2023 and 66(C) and 66(D) of I.T. Act.
3. As per allegation, the police got secret information that cyber fraud is being committed in the house of Anita Devi where the police visited and found that one person was working on mobile and after inquiry, he disclosed the name of the petitioner as accomplice in the crime. The police also recovered four mobiles from the place of occurrence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19123 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that except the confessional statement of co-accused against the petitioner, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. He further submits that even after investigation, there is no such material on record which may connect the petitioner with the alleged offence.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19123 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 2045 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T