Ranjit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20517 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2022 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

RANJIT SINGH SON OF LATE DEVI SINGH R/O NIZAM CHAK, PURVARI TOLA, UNEHCHAK, P.S.- DIGHWARA AND DISTRICTSARAN, BIHAR 841221 2.

NITU SINGH @ MITI DEVI WIFE OF SHRI RANJIT SINGH R/O NIZAM CHAK, PURVARI TOLA, UNEHCHAK, P.S.- DIGHWARA AND DISTRICT- SARAN, BIHAR 841221 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Avinash Chandra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that during pendency of this application, petitioner no.1 has been arrested by the police, as such, he prays to withdraw this application with regard to petitioner no.1.

3. Permission is granted.

4. This application with regard to petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Now, it is being heard on behalf of petitioner no.2 only.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20517 of 2023(4) dt.28-07-2023 2/3

6. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307, 506, 379 and 34 IPC.

7. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other accused persons came armed with kudal, bricks and Dabiya and assaulted the informant.

8. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. For the alleged occurrence there is case and counter-case between the parties and counter-case has been brought on record by way of supplementary affidavit. Petitioner is a lady and has no criminal antecedent.

9. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

10. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner no.2, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20517 of 2023(4) dt.28-07-2023 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No.297 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

11. This application is accordingly partly allowed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T