Bengu Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42157 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANAN District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Bengu Das Son of late Munshi Das Resident of Village- Barduari, P.S. Chandan (Anandpur), District Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 304 B/34 of the I.P.C Sujita Devi, the daughter of the informant, was married to Tribhuwan Das, the son of the petitioner last year and due to non fulfillment of demand of motorcycle, the husband and other in-laws burnt her to death.

Submission is of false implication and that due information was given to the informant regarding the death, husband is in custody, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner; the petitioner is old father-in-law who is living separately since long having no concern with the family affairs of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42157 of 2016 (3) dt.20-12-2016 2/2 the deceased and her husband.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner is father-in-law and there is general allegation.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M 1st Class, Banka in Chandan (Anandpur) P.S. Case No. 11 of 2016/ G.R. No. 190 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T