Saurav Kumar Yadav @ Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29687 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2021 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== SAURAV KUMAR YADAV @ SAURAV KUMAR Son of Budhani Yadav @ Budhan Yadav Resident of Village - Dhamdaha, P.S.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif For the Informant :

Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur Mr.Murli Manohar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other accused persons have kidnapped the son of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29687 of 2021(5) dt.27-06-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to local politics and ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is a student of B.A. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that no co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in this case rather some of them have been granted regular bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner named above is hereby rejected.

However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law, considering that the petitioner is a student. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T