Md. Faizi Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21295 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1005 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== Md. Faizi Ahmad S/o Md. Shahid @ Late Ehtesham Ahmad Resident of Village- Isapur Road, Murgia Mohalla, Near Old INasjid behind Government Apartment Phulwari Sharif, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1 .
The State of Bihar 2.
Saiyad Shami Hasan @ Saiyad Shani Hasan S/o Saiyad Mahdi Hasan Resident of Village- Islamnagar, Nawada, P.S. and District- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kanupriya Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP For complainant :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad , Advocate Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav , Advocate Mr. Saket Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420, 406, 120 ( B ), 323 , 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal code .
3 . As per the prosecution case , pursuant to agreement made between the parties for sale of land, it is alleged that Rs. 18 lacs 21 thousand was given to petitioner in cash and trhough bank in the name of accused persons and thereafter petitioner refused to execute the sale deed or to return the alleged amount.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21295 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged. It is further submitted that complainant and accused persons are distant relatives and the entire complaint case is false and concocted. Petitioner had nothing to do with the alleged incident and there is no specific allegation against him. The dispute is purely civil in nature .
5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that this petitioner has received Rs. 18 lacs 21 thousand through cash and in bank account and petitioner has got 7 criminal antecedents.
6. Considering the nature of accusation , criminal antecedetns and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U