Shri Kishun Mahto @ Kishun Mahto v. Kanhai Lal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.510 of 2019 ====================================================== Shri Kishun Mahto @ Kishun Mahto, S/o Late Bhikham Mahto, Resident of Mohalla-North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.-Buddha Colony, District- Patna. ... ... Defendant-Petitioner

Versus

1.

Kanhai Lal, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Mahton, resident of Mohalla-North Mandiri, Chhakan Tola, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. 2.

Rama Shankar Prasad, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Mahton, resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri, Chhakan Tola, P.S.- Buddha Colony, DistrictPatna. 3.

Smt. Gangagali Devi, W/o Shri Ramprit Mahto, resident of Mohalla-North Mandiri, Chhakan Tola, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. 4.

Smt. Anita Devi, W/o Devndra Prasad, D/o Late Ram Lakhan Mahto, resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri, Chhakan Tola, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna.

.... ... Plaintiffs-Petitioners-Respondents 1st Party 5.

Ashok Kumar, S/o Late Ram Nagina Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. 6.

Most. Sunaina Devi, W/o Late Arun Kumar, Resident of Mohalla-North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. 7.

Amit Kumar, S/o Late Arun Kumar, Resident of Mohalla-North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. 8.

Juhi Kumari, D/o Late Arun Kumar, Resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Defendants-Opposite Party 1st set-Respondent 2nd set 9.

Vijay Kumar, S/o Shri Kishun Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri, Chhakkan Tola, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. ... ... Defendant-Opposite Party 2nd set-Respondents 3rd Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.510 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the learned Sub Judge-II, Patna in Mis. Case No.3 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the trial court has allowed the limitation petition filed by respondent no.1 and allowed the miscellaneous case with cost of Rs.500/- and restored the Title Partition Suit No.29 of 2006 to its original file after setting aside the order dated 22.12.2011 passed in original suit.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present application. Leave is granted.

The application is disposed of.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U