Lalsan Khatoon And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62880 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2018 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Lalsan Khatoon, Wife of Sri Manir Ansari

2. Manir Ansari @ Manir Miyan s/o late Makhu Miyan both r/v Nautan Khurd Tola, Marchaiya, P.S. - Nautan, West Champaran, Bettiah .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 38/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is committing murder of informant's daughter on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law. They have falsely been implicated in this case. They are living separately and have no concern with the family affairs of the deceased.

Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They are in custody since 28.06.2018 and 18.06.2018 respectively.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62880 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of District & Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 38/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel their bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T