Mukurdhan Rajbhar @ Makudhan Rajbhar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20873 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2025 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Mukurdhan Rajbhar @ Makudhan Rajbhar Son of Late Bacha Rajbhar Resident of Village - Bakulari, P.S. - Guthani, Dist. - Siwan. 2.

Ranjeet Rajbhar @ Ranjeet Kumar Rajbhar Son of Mukurdhan Rajbhar @ Makudhan Rajbhar Resident of Village - Bakulari, P.S. - Guthani, Dist. - Siwan.

3.

Manjeet Rajhbhar @ Manjit Rajbhar Son of Mukurdhan Rajbhar @ Makudhan Rajbhar Resident of Village - Bakulari, P.S. - Guthani, Dist. - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No.395 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that all the accused persons who are petitioners have assaulted him with iron rod due to which he sustained head injury and also suffered multiple injuries on different parts of his body. It is alleged that believing him to be dead, the petitioners fled from the spot and on hearing commotion, the family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20873 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 2/3 members of informant taken him to hospital for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners and informant both are co-villagers and due to petty dispute a free fight taken place between them. Learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. has been lodged after delay of about 5 days without any plausible explanation. He further submits that the injuries to the injured is simple in nature. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have got clean antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioners as well as their clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Siwan/ concerned Court in connection with Guthani P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20873 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 3/3 No.395 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T