Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22658/2026dismissed

Sameer Paardhi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22658 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal ====================================================== Sameer Paardhi S/o Ajendr Paardhi R/o Village - Raipur, P.S- Nateranand, District - Vidisha, State - Madhya Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amaresh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. It is the case of the prosecution that Rs. 17 lakhs, which was lying with the cashier was taken away by criminals from inside the Bank when the cashier was talking to someone on phone. The petitioner was found involved in the crime. He was waiting for the miscreants on a motorcycle and they fled away on that motorcycle.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2025 and claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22658 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and he is not involved in the crime.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

7. The petitioner is a resident of Madhya Pradesh and is involved in committing crime in Bihar. Materials have come to connect the petitioner with the crime.

8. Considering the fact that during investigation materials have come to connect the petitioner with the crime, I am not inclines to grant bail to the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

10. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T