Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41571/2016bail granted

Dilip Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41571 of 2016 Arising Out of P S.Case No. -78 Year- 2016 Thana -JADIA District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Dilip Sah son of Late Vishwanath Sah, resident of Village-Parsagarhi (North), P.S.- Jadia, District-Supaul .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2016 in connection with Jadia P.S. Case No. 78 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 457, 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated only in the backdrop of a dispute between the parties with respect to non-payment of the petitioner's wages. The F.I.R. has been instituted after considerable delay on 27.07.2016 for the alleged occurrence of 23.07.2016. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41571 of 2016 (2) dt.20-10-2016 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Jadia P.S. Case No. 78 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T