Shashi Kant Kumar @ Bachcha Kumar v. Most. Sudha Devi And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.20842 of 2012 (02) dt.07-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20842 of 2012 ======================================================
1. SHASHI KANT KUMAR @ BACHCHA KUMAR SON OF LATE RAM EKBAL KUWAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATIONSIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1. MOST. SUDHA DEVI WIFE OF RAMAKANT KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
2. MANI RANJAN KUMAR ALIAS GUNJAN KUMAR SON OF LATE RAMAKANT KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
3. DEVKANT KUMAR SON OF LATE MAHENDRA KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
4. SRIKANT KUMAR SON OF LATE MAHENDRA KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
5. YOGENDRA KUMAR SON OF LATE NARAY KUWAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
6. ASHOK KUMAR SON OF LATE BIRENDRA KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
7. RAGHO KUWAR SON OF LATE BALDEV KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
8. NAND KISHORE KUMAR SON OF BAADSHAHI KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN
9. AJIT KUMAR SON OF RAMCHANDRA KUWAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAUNA, POLICE STATION- SIKARGANJ, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN .... .... RESPONDENT/S ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh-Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 07-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner, who happens to be plaintiff, wants to nip the bud by way of challenging the order dated 23.08.2012
Patna High Court CWJC No.20842 of 2012 (02) dt.07-01-2016 whereby and whereunder the learned lower Court had relaxed in accepting written statement which, in view of the petitioner, committed mistake. Written statement was filed within 90 days from the date of appearance which the learned lower Court had accepted by the order impugned.
I do not see any kind of illegality, because of the fact that dispersion of justice should be the prime issue, which the learned lower Court had parted with.
Accordingly, instant petition is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Amit/- U