← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20826/2012dismissed

Raj Kumar Singh v. Lalan Singh And ORS

2016-01-07Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20826 of 2012 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Singh Son Of Sakaldip Singh Resident Of Village Chipura, P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Lalan Singh Son Of Ramnath Singh Resident Of Village Chilhar, P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur

2. Lakhan Singh Son Of Janki Singh Resident Of Village Chipura, P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur

3. Baja Singh Son Of Janki Singh Resident Of Village Chipura, P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arbind Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 07-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 28.04.2011 passed by the learned lower court whereby and whereunder, the learned lower court withholding to pronounce judgment, directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.250/- so that date put after signature of one Lalan Singh who happens to be defendant should be seen in the background of inconsistency or overwriting or having been penned at different occasion.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid order has been passed on the basis of petition filed on behalf of defendant however, the order did not speak to have based upon such kind of prayer rather it happens to be the own

Patna High Court CWJC No.20826 of 2012 (2) dt.07-01-2016 finding of the learned lower court which the learned lower court is fully competent.

Accordingly, instant petition is found devoid of merit and is accordingly rejected.

However, its made clear that the suit is of the year 1999. It has also been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he had already deposited the amount as required by the court. Consequent thereupon, the court will proceed rapidly in having FSL report and will conclude the trial within three months positively after receipt of report.

Office to communicate.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) PN/- U