Chansi Kumar @ Chansi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18471 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18471 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -580 Year- 2016 Thana -MANER District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Chansi Kumar @ Chansi Rai Son of Sri Sabha Rai, Resident of VillageBhatehari, P.O.- Manner, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Maner P.S. Case No. 580 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section-379 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. In the written report, it is alleged that when the informant did not become ready to allow the petitioner to board the tempo, the petitioner assaulted him and snatched Rs. 900/-. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that while the petitioner was returning after tuition, hot exchange of talk took place and, thereafter, this false case has been instituted against the petitioner.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18471 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 allowed it is ordered that the petitioners named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 580 of 2016 to the satisfaction of Sri Randhir Kumar, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T