Rajnish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38172 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2015 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Rajnish Kumar Singh, son of Mahendra Singh, resident of VillageChakla Nirmali, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.L.Verma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 379, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Prosecution case is that a feast was organized at the house of the informant when accused persons came, assaulted the guests and also assaulted the son of the informant with the butt of the pistol. The accused persons snatched gold chain of the informant and took away box containing Rs.26,500/-.

The accused persons also damaged some of the vehicles of the guests.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that accusation is omnibus and general. There is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38172 of 2015 (2) dt.24-09-2015 land dispute between the informant and his agnates. The petitioner has been roped in the present case since the agnate of the informant is Manager of the petitioner. Injury of the informant's son and other injured were found superficial in nature. There is counter version of the occurrence. Statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that during investigation the accusation was not found true but he is not sure that investigation has concluded and final form has been submitted.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 162 of 2015, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T