← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29582/2021bail granted

Puja Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29582 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2020 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== PUJA SINGH Wife of Amit Kumar Resident of Village - Dumri Kala, Ward No. 01, P.S. - Mejorganj, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2736 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29582 of 2021(2) dt.10-08-2021 2/3 owner of the pick up van. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 2736 liters wine is recovered from the Bolero pick-up van. The said pick up van is run as public carrier. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the nature of goods booked by the transporter. The petitioner is a lady. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on her personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II-cum- Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 359 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29582 of 2021(2) dt.10-08-2021 3/3 weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T