← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9672/2021dismissed

Gunama Yadav @ Gunna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-12Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9672 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-592 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

GUNAMA YADAV @ GUNNA YADAV Son of Rajan Yadav Resident of Village - Dalli Bigha, P.S.- Bela, District- Gaya 2.

Surendra Yadav Son of Durga Yadav @ Devsharan Yadav Resident of Village - Dalli Bigha, P.S.- Bela, District- Gaya 3.

Pramod Kumar Yadav Son of Karu Yadav @ Sakaldip Yadav Resident of Village - Dalli Bigha, P.S.- Bela, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajni Kant Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2023 This application has been filed for quashing the FIR of Excise Case No. 592 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the illicit country-made liquor was not recovered from the house of the petitioners and they have falsely been implicated in this case.

3. The seizure list shows that the petitioners were named in column 2. On police raid, the petitioners became successful in fleeing away, but after excavation of the land, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9672 of 2021(2) dt.12-09-2023 2/2 illicit country-made liquor was found/recovered. The specific allegation against the petitioners is that they were involved in a case under Section 30 (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

4. I do not find any substance in the present petition to quash the FIR of Excise Case No. 592 of 2019.

5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T