Mohan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.64776 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -302 Year- 2017 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Mohan Manjhi, Son of Late Chetu Manjhi, Resident of Village- Masle, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S.Case No. 302 of 2017, registered for the offence under Sections 397, 395/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is of that some unknown miscreants entered into the house of the informant and looted some ornaments, cash and mobile phone. It also appears that the petitioner is an accused in five cases also. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has not committed any offence rather, he has not put on Test Identification Parade and the name of the petitioner transpires on the confessional statement of co-accused, Vijay Pandit @ Bipin Pandit and charge sheet has already been
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64776 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 2/2 submitted against the petitioner, moreover the petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P. also who opposed the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the allegation as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew prayer for bail after framing of charge.
With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is accordingly dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T