← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13593/2017bail granted

Sunil Tiger And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13593 of 2017 (3) dt.26-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13593 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2016 Thana -SHAKURABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Sunil Tiger Son of Dayanand Yadav.

2. Mahendra Paswan Son of Late Ramchandra Paswan.

3. Niranjan Paswan Son of Mahendra Paswan All Resident of Village- Chiksaura, P.S.- Shakurabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 109 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioners and other co-accused started assaulting the informant and his brothers after being instigated by petitioner no. 1 Sunil Tiger, resulting, Awadhesh Kumar, Ashok Kumar and Sunil Kumar were seriously injured and petitioner no. 1 Sunil Tiger by pointing out gun caused threats also and further snatched gold chain and cash of Rs. 35,000/-. Submission is of false implication and that the occurrence

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13593 of 2017 (3) dt.26-04-2017 has taken place due to removal of idol of Lord Shiva and Dhwja, there is no specific allegation against the petitioners, the allegations are omnibus and general in nature and as such the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration. The opinion regarding injury has been kept reserved.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners, the allegations are omnibus and general in nature, the petitioners above named, in case of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, shall be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 109 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T