Pradeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- Kasar District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar S/o Rambalak Yadav R/o Village- Atari, P.S.- Dhamaul, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner makes a prayer for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 393 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case as disclosed in the FIR is that the informant was intercepted by some unknown miscreants, who tried to snatch away his mobile and money but upon alarm being raised by him, the accused persons fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be apparent from the FIR that FIR has been lodged against unknown miscreants and the name of the petitioner has transpired upon suspicion. However, no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2024 and the charge sheet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22512 of 2025(3) dt.29-05-2025 2/2 has been submitted.

5. The learned APP opposes the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner has six criminal antecedent of similar nature. However, it is submitted that the petitioner is on bail in all the cases.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Kasar P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024.

7. However, the petitioner is directed to mark his attendance before the Shekhpura police station once in a month till the disposal of the case. However, it is directed that the petitioner would appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court till the charges are framed and in case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T