Sintu Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21074 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2019 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== SINTU YADAV @ RAJEEV KUMAR RANJAN Son of Late Bhawir Yadav @ Bibhishan Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Lagar, P.S.- Parbatta, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case no. 128 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 386, 387, 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner and coaccused Ranbir Yadav caught hold the hands of the informant's husband and accused Mantu Yadav fired upon the head of the informant's husband, namely, Subodh Yadav, as a result of which he died on spot.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21074 of 2022(3) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 offence. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. After investigation, police submitted final form against the petitioner and differing from the final form, learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioner. Specific allegation of firing is against Mantu Yadav and not against the petitioner.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case no. 128 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Khagaria subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U