Md. Firoz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61758 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2018 Thana -TARABARI District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Firoz, S/o Mojiv @ Mojib, Resident of Village- Jhauwwa, P.S. Tarabari, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tarabari P.S.Case no.87 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 354B, 354D of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he followed the daughter of the informant and tried to outrage her modesty. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a shopkeeper as there was some dues of the petitioner with the informant, as such he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody for about three months. The charge sheet has been submitted.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61758 of 2018 (2) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Araria in connection with Tarabari P.S.Case nO.87 of 2018.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T