Akhilesh Kumar Yadav @ Putul Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24759 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Yadav @ Putul Yadav S/O Late Baijnath Yadav R/O VillageCairatpur, P.S- Manjhi, Distt.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Mili Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a Boat. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and he is not the owner of the boat. It is further submitted that the police in mechanical manner implicates either at the instance of local people or the chowkidar but then if the local person was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24759 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 prior to institution of the instant F.I.R., which casts an aspersion on the case of the petitioner.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.333/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T