Krishnanand Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6915 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHRA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Krishnanand Roy Son of late Jageshwar Roy Resident of Village- Gandaul, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Upendra Prasad Smt Veena Kumari For the Opposite Party : Mr. C. Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 384, 386, 504, 506 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons having been armed reached at the house of the informant and started abusing the informant and when the cousin brother of the informant asked them not to abuse the accused persons started abusing and assaulting his cousin brother. Thereafter on 27.03.2016, the cousin brother of the informant received a threatening call from the associate of the petitioner namely Pappu Deo to co-operate his associate Pradeep Thakur @ Lallu Thakur in the election, otherwise all will be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6915 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 killed by them.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The main allegation is against co-accused Pappu Deo. Similarly situated other co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail vide Annexure-2 to the present application.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T