← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18867/2014disposed

Prasant Raj And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-12-05Mr. Justice Harish Kumar,Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18867 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.

Prasant Raj, son of Sukhadev Sah, resident of Village- Jahangirpur Sham, P.O.- Azampur, P.S.- Desari, District- Vaishali, 2.

Vijay Kumar, son of Chandeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village and P.O.- Azampur, P.S.- Desari, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, State of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department (Personnel Administrative Reform Department), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, Patna, through its Secretary 5.

The Chairman of Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC 9 with Ms. Deepika Sharma, AC to SC 9 For the Selecton Board :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 05-12-2022 None appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel for the Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, and Ms. Dipika Sharma, learned AC to SC 9 for the State are present.

3. Earlier also, when the matter was taken up on 02.12.2022, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It is

Patna High Court CWJC No.18867 of 2014(3) dt.05-12-2022 2/2 needless to say that the matter relates to selection of the Constable held in the year 2009, which has already attained finality.

4. Considering the fact that none has appeared to represent the case of the petitioners, the present writ application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) J. Alam/- U