Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30894 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2020 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR Son of Kailash Yadav Resident of Village - Mahkar, P.S. - Roh, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Mr. Ansul For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Mritunjay Kr. Gautam For the Informant Mr. Arjun Prasad, MR. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Roh P.S. Case no. 164 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 302, 307, 120B, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is a case of committing the murder of informant's husband namely Sunil Yadav over a dispute of grazing buffalo. Coaccused Vinay Yadav @ Chotu Yadav has opened fire which hit on the chest of the husband of the informant. Petitioner has also fired upon the informant which did not hit her.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and local village politics. Specific allegation of killing her husband

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30894 of 2021(3) dt.11-07-2022 2/2 by gun shot is against co-accused Ranjeet Yadav. Petitioner is not an author of the injury caused to the deceased. Both parties are covillages. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. He has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Roh P.S. Case no. 164 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Sushma/- U