Santosh Choubey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63906 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -320 Year- 2018 Thana -DUMRAO District- BUXAR ====================================================== Santosh Choubey .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rang Nath Choubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dumraon P.S.Case No. 320 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 448, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that the petitioner entered into house of the informant and tried to commit rape upon the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and whole story is not believable because whole family members were present there and both parties have compromised. It is also
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63906 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 10.08.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Dudmraon P.S.Case No. 320 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T